1. Home
  2. Cities & Towns
  3. Phoenix
Judy Hedding

Judy's Phoenix Blog

By Judy Hedding, About.com Guide to Phoenix

Arizona Proposition 300 - State Legislator's Salaries

Monday September 22, 2008
In November 2008 voters in Arizona will address Proposition 300, sponsored by Commission on Salaries for Elective State Officers.

A five-member, bi-partisan Commission comprised of citizens was appointed by the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House and the Arizona Chief Justice. They unanimously agreed to recommend via Proposition 300 that the salaries of legislators should be raised from $24,000 to $30,000 per year.

Click on "Read more" to see a synopsis of the pros and cons and find more information about this ballot measure.

Will you vote in favor of Proposition 300?

1) Yes, legislators' salaries should be raised.
2) No, legislators' salaries should not be raised.

View Poll Results

Advocates of Proposition 300 say that: "Even if you have issues with how legislators have done their jobs, they are seriously underpaid and deserve a raise. Their compensation of only $24,000 per year has not been raised for many years and must be improved to attract the best and brightest to legislative service, especially people who may not work for a large business or utility that can afford to subsidize their incomes. We need citizen legislators who can be paid enough in salary so they don't depend on special interests to supplement their incomes."

Opponents of Proposition 300 say that: "The role of the legislature is quite simple: Pass an annual budget and GO HOME. It is a part time legislature that is supposed to meet less than 100 days a year. Being elected is a civic minded contribution, not a career. . . . The one thing legislators cannot seem to do in a timely manner is pass a budget. I certainly would not pay legislators more for a job they currently cannot seem to do as more of your tax money would simply encourage prolonging the budget process further."

UPDATE: Proposition 300 failed with 65% of the voters voting no.

You Might Also Be Interested In....

Comments

October 13, 2008 at 1:24 am
(1) Anthony T says:

Hey, when i get a decent cost of living raise…..I will vote one for you. Until then VOTE NO on PROP 300.

October 14, 2008 at 11:49 am
(2) Robert says:

The role of the legislature is quite simple: Pass an annual budget and GO HOME. you dont need more money. you need to do your job. remember we the people voted you in and we can vote you out. be thankful you get $24,000.00 a year for part time work.

October 17, 2008 at 7:49 pm
(3) CAJ says:

You have to be kidding me……HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

October 17, 2008 at 9:08 pm
(4) Mike L. says:

I say give our State’s public servants a small pay raise. Most serve because they believe in making a postive difference. In the past I voted NO every time this came up but honestly, $30K will not break the State’s budget to compensate mostly honest people. People who try hard to make Arizona a better place.

October 20, 2008 at 3:08 pm
(5) Chris says:

Haha. These people do nothing and want more money? How about a proposition to raise the salaries of USEFUL government employees, like teachers, police and fire workers, and court officials?

October 21, 2008 at 9:31 am
(6) adam says:

Most of you are very short sided in your thinking. Have you ever heard the term…”You get what you pay for?” Maybe if we gave a little more then we could get some more qualified candidates.

October 22, 2008 at 2:15 am
(7) Michelle says:

What is the true job description for these Legislators? Without slinging mud, can anyone tell me? It can’t be as simple as planning a budget. There has to be more than that. It must be rough to rely on voters that you don’t know, that don’t know you, and have absolutely no idea what you do - make a decision on what you get paid. Our economy sucks right now. You can’t pull anymore money out of us when we are all struggling to make ends meet as it is… I just don’t think right now is the time to make room in the budget to entertain that thought. I’m sorry, but I will be voting no this time around. If you are one of the five members reading this - please don’t take it personally. As most employers are either on a hiring freeze or laying people off in this state, I just don’t think that raises should be awarded just yet. Don’t let that discourage you though - we all just need to wait it out. Put it on the ballot at a later date.

October 22, 2008 at 8:53 am
(8) Lori says:

I have to comment here. I am someone who would LOVE to serve a term..or two..working as a legislator in Phoenix. And most Arizonan’s would probably think I did a decent job too, because I am not like these wealthy cattlemen and busniessowners who serve us there now. They, after all, are the only ones who can afford such a piddly salary. So, once again, the common, working “man” is excluded from participation in our government by its very design. Raise the pay…the fatcats there now won’t bat an eye at the raise-hence their lack of verbiage either for or against this measure. But for 35K/year, I could and would serve a go ’round over there to try and bring some common, everyday sense back to our government.

October 24, 2008 at 4:32 pm
(9) Linda G says:

What isn’t mentioned is not only do the legislators get $24,000 for part time work, but also 10K plans, health and dental benefits, and those great lobbyists lunches. Until the campaign laws are reformed, this will not at all cut out the special interests slush funds they receive in the form of campaign contributions. They do have more to do than simply pass a budget, they desperately need to spend at least two sessions reviewing any and all past legislation, and rescind about 3/4’s of the existing laws on Constitutional grounds - you know, the ones they passed for those special interests groups at the general public and citizens expense!

October 24, 2008 at 4:37 pm
(10) Linda G says:

Oh, and I forgot they also get per diems for extra session days, and expense accounts at the Arizona public’s expense. They might be able to balance the budget if they removed the expense accounts from the Governor and legislature. The Governor’s recent trips in the past three years have been to England, Canada, Mexico (almost more than she’s in Arizona) and Iraq….

That’s where your money goes, Arizonans. They may not get it in “salary,” but certainly make it up in benies, most of which they voted for themselves.

October 28, 2008 at 2:07 pm
(11) holley says:

I put my life at risk full time everyday as a health care worker and I make less than that so I will vote NO. Give me a break!!!!!

October 28, 2008 at 2:23 pm
(12) TRUDY TERZO says:

I AGREE WITH CAJ HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HA

October 28, 2008 at 4:10 pm
(13) Moose says:

Hahahaha thats funny they chose to be in the legislative instead of getting a job that would pay more than 24000. They chose that so they deserve thet!!!!

October 30, 2008 at 4:52 pm
(14) Misty says:

You have GOT to be kidding me! I’m glad I decided to check on all the propositions before it was time to vote. This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard!

I feel that all elected officials (to exclude the President) should be serving in office on a VOLUNTARY basis anyway and that they should do so on THEIR OWN TIME and with NO PAY! Vote no on the rich getting richer…….

October 31, 2008 at 5:43 am
(15) Kim says:

Why is it that we have to pay extra money for a job they asked to do? Is this kind of like the buy out that we ended up paying for. Why don’t we send them to a resort just like the AIG big wigs. Did any of us enjoy that trip? I think not. They just keep on trying to figure out a way to give it to us without having to use K-Y jelly. I’m getting tired of these government people saying they are there for us. They’re just there to see how much they can get from us. I’m voting NO.

November 2, 2008 at 11:20 pm
(16) PublicServant says:

I am a AZ state DES employee and have gotton a mealsy 2 percent raise in 2007 only to not bring it home..the piddy raise infact went into a mandatory AZ State Retirement portfolio. I and the rest of DES employees did not get a choice in this matter. We also need to be paid $30,000 or more!… We have been left on the back burner year after year and guess who put us there???? Duh? the LEGISLATORS!!!! We are FULLTIME employees who ensure our needy families are fed, clothed, shelterd, and healthy… Sure.. we get our benefits that most if not all working class citizens get from their employers…but we do not get perks!! fancy lucheons… trips….business accounts and all that jazz…so… if I don’t get raise the Legislators should not either!!! I vote NO on prop 300! and I make no apologies.

November 3, 2008 at 4:29 am
(17) Kevin B. Bantz says:

So they haven’t received a raise since Clinton was in office? I wouldn’t take a job if I got a raise every 10 or 20 years at this rate. Hold on, don’t they have to use their own personal savings first, and get elected, to get the privilege of representing their fellow neighbors and get lambasted daily by their fellow uninformed constituents? Don’t we already have a law against that type of masochism? I hope I don’t miss the wife and kids while I’m away for you. Oh, I’ll probably have to pay for an additional place to stay in Phoenix when we’re in session too, besides my home in Havasu. Please tell me I get an office, er room where they can send the hate mail. Tell me again why I wanna do this instead of flipping hamburgers? Oh yeah, for you, my fellow loving citizens. Screw the raise, where do I sign up.

November 3, 2008 at 9:03 pm
(18) Duke Fan says:

No, I am not giving them a raise. But that money into the AZDOT and fix the roads!

November 3, 2008 at 10:47 pm
(19) kj says:

Yo… ADAM, have YOU ever heard that a person who truly believes in what they do, who want to make themselves heard and be a part for the common good, don’t expect high monetary compensation??? If its in your heart to do something, then you’re not going to require a large paycheck to do it… FOR EXAMPLE, let’s nsee hmmm… teachers, hmmmm doctors who work in hellish conditions in poverty-striken countries, social services personnel, the list is enormous, come on, get what you pay for IS what you’ll get, someone looking for a simple way to increase THEIR wealth!

November 4, 2008 at 1:12 pm
(20) Catherine says:

$24,000 does not pay for the gas or a babysitter. Where are we going to find qualified people if will not even pay their expenses?

November 4, 2008 at 3:36 pm
(21) Monikka says:

$24,000 for less than a hundred days work…sounds more than fair.

November 4, 2008 at 6:29 pm
(22) Cheryl says:

I vote yes, who can live off of that? Also, how about our teachers, what a about a prop for them?

November 5, 2008 at 2:50 am
(23) Jennifer says:

Anyone who votes No on prop 300 is more than selfish! Check out the average cost of living definitions for poverty rates. It’s not fair to ask our state legislatures to live under such standards.

November 5, 2008 at 1:22 pm
(24) Richard says:

The last commentor is misinformed just as all the uneducated misinformed people that voted for Obama. Do you really think that those legistors are living on that income alone? Most of them either have cash or it is a second income, they only work 100 days or less per year; wake up and smell the coffee. Just look at how much they have NOT done. Do you get a raise before you perform at work, I seriously doubt that. They need to prove themselves first and get a raise later. I can’t believe the dumbed down state of this country, reading this stuff just verifies it for me. Go home and watch more TV so you can get dummer!

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Phoenix

About.com Special Features

Holiday Central

What to eat, where to go, fun things to do and how to save money on the perfect gifts. More >

On the National Mall in Washington, DC

Take a look at the capital&#39;s best sight-seeing spot. More >

  1. Home
  2. Cities & Towns
  3. Phoenix

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.