| You are here: | About>Cities & Towns>Phoenix> Shopping, Services, Media> Beware of Scanning Errors - Arizona Department of Weights and Measures |
![]() | Phoenix |
Topics
Attractions and EventsFood and DrinkSports and RecreationMoving to PhoenixPhoenix Facts and FictionCities, Government, LawsWeather, Plants, AnimalsJobs and EmploymentHomes and RentalsSchools and CollegesLifestyles and FamiliesShopping, Services, MediaMaps, Driving and TransportResorts, Hotels, MotelsPhoenix Photo Galleries |
Shoppers may want to check their receipts twice after reviewing the 2001 UPC Pricing Accuracy Report, released by the Arizona Department of Weights & Measures. The report showed that in 60% the 2,255 UPC inspections conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2001 retailers failed to scan items accurately. According to Arizona law (A.R.S.
41-2081), all retailers are subject to UPC price accuracy inspections. This type
of inspection consists of either 25 or 50 items (depending on the amount of
products the store offers). The purpose of the inspection is to verify that the
shelf or display price equals the scanned price. To pass the UPC inspection, the
store can have no more than one error per inspection. In
2000 there were 1,053 fewer inspections and a 52% failure rate.
The major reason for the 8% increase in failure rate in 2001?
Many retailers were visited for the first time in 2001. This year’s
report also reflects a continuing trend -- the majority of the errors are
undercharges (in the favor of the consumer). The
dollar value of the undercharges is almost three times the amount of overcharges
(in favor of the retailer). This may
sound like a great deal to shoppers, but according to the Department it is not.
“When
scanning errors occur, it means that retailers are making mistakes. You may
benefit from that mistake during one shopping trip but not the next,”
says Sandy Williams, Director of the Department. “To make sure you’re not
overcharged, consumers are strongly urged to write down shelf prices, watch the
register display and check the receipt before leaving the store.” To assist consumers and enable them to review all the results of their favorite store, the Department has placed all UPC inspection results on their web site. Here are the summaries of the best and the worst findings of retailers that received UPC inspections between January 1, 2001 and October 31, 2001. The Best Retailers
For stores with five or more UPC inspections, Sam’s Club was at the top of the Best UPC accuracy list, based on a 99% average score, zero failures and zero overcharges. Lowe’s Home Improvement also received high ratings because they appeared in all three “best” categories. The Worst Retailers
Petco and NAPA Auto Parts both received the lowest overall rating for UPC pricing accuracy because they scored in all three “worst” categories. Most Improved Retailers Some
stores that had low scores in the past made dramatic improvements since the
Department’s UPC Pricing Accuracy program was expanded and the inspection
results publicized. Retailers who had the most dramatic improvement between 2000
and 2001 include NAPA Auto Parts, Robinsons-May, Sears, Food City, JC Penney,
Macy's, Circle K and Toys 'R' Us. “Although
we have seen a continued increase in attention from the business community in
achieving pricing accuracy, retailers in our state have a long way to go before
consumers can be confident that the price they see advertised is what they will
be charged. We take this program very seriously since pricing inaccuracy is a
violation of the law,"
says Director Williams. Shopping Tips With 20 Compliance Officers to regulate all Arizona retailers, the Department relies heavily on consumers to be their eyes and ears in the marketplace. The Department of Weights & Measures advises consumers to do the following every time they shop:
1. Bring ads with you. ©2001 Judy Hedding, licensed to
About.com
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Topics | Email Article | | | ![]() |
| Advertising Info | News & Events | Work at About | SiteMap | Reprints | Help | Our Story | Be a Guide |
| User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy | ©2008 About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. |


